“After a year of looking for the truth, I finally found it, and it was the last argument that I needed to consider when making up my mind about who was right and who was wrong.”

No Beauty in the Beast: Israel Without Her Mascara exposes Israel and Zionism for what it really is, an unrepentant, burnt out, unconscionable syphilitic whore. Michael Collins Piper said it slightly differently, but he said it just the same, when he wrote in the forward of Glenn’s book No Beauty in the Beast, “Mark Glenn demonstrates, beyond any doubt, that Israel ‘without her mascara’ is no beauty, but, instead a beast.”

http://pcapostate.blogspot.com/2007/03/no-beauty-in-beast-israel-without-her.html

Alas, if only it weren't true. But it is. Fact is, it has always been true about the demonic state of Israel. A list of today's sequels for those in the camp of "let them eat cake":

http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/nationworld/bal-te.hebron31mar31,0,7667974.story?coll=bal-nationworld-headlines

http://media.theage.com.au/?rid=26902

The following video is very well done:

http://www.libertyforum.org/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=w3t_news_video&Number=295378952

Finkelstein: The main reason I wrote the book is because I thought that the Nazi holocaust was being exploited by Israel and its supporters in the United States against the Palestinians and against basic principles of justice. That is, the Nazi holocaust is being used as a political weapon in order to silence criticism of Israeli policies in the Occupied Territories. There were also other reasons for writing the book. Obviously, there was a personal reason, namely my parents passed through the Nazi holocaust. Every member of their families was exterminated during the war and I felt it was important to accurately represent what happened to them during the Nazi holocaust. As for my credibility, I think that one should apply to everybody a single standard, namely evaluate the evidence, evaluate the argument. If the evidence is valid, if the argument seems reasonable, then your credibility is good. If the evidence seems weak, if the argument seems unreasonable, then your credibility is bad. I don't think it has much to do with whether or not you're a Jew.

http://newsmax.com/scripts/printer_friendly.pl?page=http://newsmax.com/archives/articles/2007/3/30/204228.shtml?s=lh

The following is a "hadith" which is not something from the Qur'an but a statement which was reportedly made by the last Hebrew prophet Mohamed (SAW) and recorded by various recorders after his death. In this case it is recorded by one of the most reliable "Sunni" scholars
named Sahih Buhkari. For me, I never preferred this hadith
as it seems to make it an order when in fact it is an OBSERVATION:

Sahih Bukhari Hadith Volume 4, Book 52, Number 176: Narrated by 'Abdullah bin 'Umar: Allah's Apostle said, "You (i.e. Muslims) will fight with the Jews till some of them will hide behind stones. The stones will (betray them) saying, 'O 'Abdullah (i.e. slave of Allah)! There is a Jew hiding behind me; so kill him.'" Sahih Bukhari Hadith Volume 4, Book 52, Number 177: Narrated by Abu Huraira: Allah's Apostle said, "The Hour will not be established until you fight with the Jews, and the stone behind which a Jew will be hiding will say. "O Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me, so kill him."

I continue to invite all Jews to Islam. With open arms.