A Brief History of Time
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rehavam_Zeevi
Most poets cannot spell the name let alone know of the significance of that old assassination...so long ago now. I remember it well. Ah. It made sense, the collaborative sensation of keeping "Arafat" in protective custody (which is all Ramallah ever was, a propaganda trick which hid a darker side of Israeli-Arab politics and power mongering). The Bills, the Bobs and the Marys..or as is the case here: the Hobeikas, the Hariris and the Ze'evis....of the world.
A bit about this "lion" of Zion:
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/print.php3?what=news&id=98944
Everyone enjoys a good mafia story and the story of Zionism is one of the Greatest Stories Ever Told:
Naughty Naughty Naughty!
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/news.php3?id=99889
One must ask, did Abu Mazen (Abbas) like the idea of transfers also? Forget the rhetoric of an Iranian simpleton like Ahmadinijad! One would hope that Abbas wouldn't like someone like Olmert or, would refuse to let notorious felons out on the loose, particularly with Big Brother USA watching over the process so closely (pretending all the while to be ignorant of the principle players and their mafia roles REGARDLESS of what is "supposed to be" their religious affiliation: Monotheism via Judaic or Islamic precepts and contentions).
It was never a wonder to me why Elie Hobeika was assassinated either. It wasn't because of Sharon...like Nasrallah pointed out during the first days of this "Israeli bargaining chip offered to their contentious fanatics" i.e. the Lebanese Hate Crime called an "incursion"....everyone knew what Sharon was...some even respected his strategic prowess including Nasrallah even if Sharon is a notorious war criminal. How many self help books and gurus on the frontlines of American Businessmanism tell you exactly that: Respect your opponent. ????? Most, if not all.
What is most telling about this wave of deception, terror and protectionism? It is and must be answered again, with a question.
Was the Lebanese War Crime a way of Olmert making good on his pledge towards honoring his Zionist supporters and intentions in the aftermath of "allowing" known assassins to simply walk out of the "Ramallah" compound (the ruse of 'attacking' Arafat, who is known to have enriched himself with US/Zionist payoffs is really just a ruse to keep the assassins of Ze'evi in a low security facility under the watchful eye of who? The Devil.)...was that just another deal in the long and winding trail of dealmaking? The fact that Osama was "let loose" by Clinton and a variety of others who well understood the threat the man was to public security, especially the Shi'i of Afghanistan.
One has to ask that question and one has to have a long memory to pull Ze'evi out of a hat, like a trick. Or a Hobeika.
Happy Valentine's Day Lebanon and if you don't accept that invitation to Civil War, we'll just give you a bigger one.
The least thing however that a conscientious observer to all of this can gain is the knowledge that the Palestinians are not simply refusing Abbas' deal, but refusing another Arafat in the making. Sadly enough, no one is applauding them in their resistance to this type of meddling. No one understands the cause nor the solution it seems. They just don't care.
Oh what a tangled web that was woven!.....an even longer memory for the nine released ones....the list of "one eyes" and that sort of thing is here:
http://www.al-huda.com/NB%20SM19.htm
3 comments:
And, sadly enough, most lack the balls to take me head on anymore and instead, insist on posting ludicrous sentiments about...er...whatever it is that floats their boat for any given day and mood swing.
Ahmadinijad's contention is not a simple one at all. All he asks is:
If it is the Holocaust you seek to reparate, then reparate on your own soil. The soil of those who aided and abetted the Zionist entity...the whole lot of them. Christian Zionists (whose link to Nazism is PROFOUND and that would include the papists) to the upper echelons of British banking and society.
http://www.al-huda.com/NB%20SM19.htm
The event of his second imprisonment is that when the Holy Prophet of Islam passed away from this world a rebellion occurred in the region of Hadramawt for repelling which Caliph Abú Bakr wrote to the governor of the place Ziyád ibn Labíd al-Bayádi. al-Ansárí that he should secure allegiance and collect zakát and charities from those people. When Ziyád ibn Labíd went to the tribe of Banú `Amr ibn Mu`áwiyah for collection of zakát he took keen fancy for a she-camel of Shaytán ibn Hujr which was very handsome and of huge body. He jumped over it and took possession of it. Shaytán ibn Hujr did not agree to spare it and said to him to take over some other she-camel in its place but Ziyád would not agree. Shaytán sent for his brother al-`Addá’ ibn Hujr for his support. On coming he too had a talk but Ziyád insisted on his point and did not, by any means, consent to keep off his hand from that she-camel. At last both these brothers appealed to Masrúq ibn Ma`dí Karib for help. Consequently, Masrúq also used his influence so that Ziyád might leave the she-camel but he refused categorically, whereupon Masrúq became enthusiastic and untying the she-camel handed it over to Shaytán. On this Ziyád was infuriated and collecting his men became ready to fight. On the other side Banú Walí`ah also assembled to face them, but could not defeat Ziyád and were badly beaten at his hands. Their women were taken away and property was looted. Eventually those who had survived were obliged to take refuge under the protection of al-Ash`ath. Al-Ash`ath promised assistance on the condition that he should be acknowledged ruler of the area. Those people agreed to this condition and his coronation was also formally solemnised. After having his authority acknowledged he arranged an army and set out to fight Ziyád. On the other side Abú Bakr had written to the chief of Yemen, al-Muhájir ibn Abí Umayyah to go for the help of Ziyád with a contingent. Al-Muhájir was coming with his contingent when they came face to face. Seeing each other they drew swords and commenced fighting at ad-Zurqán. In the end al-Ash`ath fled from the battle-field and taking his remaining men closed himself in the fort of an-Nujayr. The enemy was such as to let them alone. They laid siege around the fort. Al-Ash`ath thought how long could he remain shut up in the fort with this lack of equipment and men, and that he should think out some way of escape. So one night he stealthily came out of the fort and met Ziyád and al-Muhájir and conspired with them that if they gave asylum to nine members of his family he would get the fort gate opened. They accepted this term and asked him to write for them the names of those nine persons. He wrote down the nine names and made them over to them, but acting on his traditional wisdom forgot to write his own name in that list. After settling this he told his people that he has secured protection for them and the gate of the fort should be opened. When the gate was opened Ziyád forces pounced upon them. They said they had been promised protection whereupon Ziyád’s army said that this was wrong and that al-Ash`ath had asked protection only for nine members of his house, whose names preserved with them. In short eight hundred persons were put to sword and hands of several women were chopped off, while according to the settlement nine men were left off, but the case of al-Ash`ath became complicated. Eventually it was decided he should be sent to Abú Bakr and he should decided about him. At last he was sent to Medina in chains along with a thousand women prisoners. On the way relations and others, men and women, all hurled curses at him and the women were calling him traitor and one who got his own people put to sword. Who else can be a greater traitor? However, when he reached Medina Abú Bakr released him and on that occasion he was married to Umm Farwah.
Post a Comment