The Pope and his Mossad: Opus Dei in Lebanon.
http://www.lebanese-forces.org/vbullet/showthread.php?p=31465
Cinematographer's nightmare if you ask me. Guess they are the ones who banned the Da Vinci Code in Lebanon so us poor muslims couldn't read it. Damn. Life is strange.
Now, I've no problem with Clinton at the tomb of the Patriarchs nor do I have a problem with the Pope doing this sort of thing either. My problem is with the Zionist Regime's desire to install a Christian Minority as Dictator over a de facto and majority Muslim country. THAT is what ought to bother every thinking individual.
PICKTHAL: And the Jews say the Christians follow nothing (true), and the Christians say the Jews follow nothing (true); yet both are readers of the Scripture. Even thus speak those who know not. Allah will judge between them on the Day of Resurrection concerning that wherein they differ.
4 comments:
http://www.wrfnet.org/articles/printarticle.asp?ID=604
"Judaism, then, was a servile religion. This spiritual assessment was not yet translated into a political reality. It was only after the 13th century that Jewish servitude acquired a juridical meaning. Then the concept of Jewish chamber serfdom was introduced and South German Schwabenspiegel no longer regarded Jews as free men. Prior to this the church leadership saw little point in examining a slavish religion in its own terms. They were, however, watchful to guard their own flock against Jewish influences, especially as Jews regularly challenged their interpretation of the Hebrew Scriptures. The conflict, therefore, between Christianity and Judaism from these early centuries into the medieval period turned on who had the authentic interpretation of the God-given Hebrew Scriptures. Indeed, we can say that though the intensity of the conflict varied and often the church had other priorities, this remained the heart of the confrontation between Christianity and Judaism. If I may jump ahead, the situation only changed when in the 18th century the idea of special divine revelation was queried and this process went a stage further in the 19th century with the inspiration and integrity of the Hebrew Scriptures being challenged within the Christian church itself. At the same time anti-supernatural trends were working in the Jewish community with the result that some liberal Jews were glad to renounce the idea that their Torah had originally been given to Moses by God on Mount Sinai. And to this day we are faced with a scenario where some from the Jewish and Christian communities are able to find common ground because they have endorsed a position where they can be selective with the biblical record."
When did God become a Human?
"In particular, he dismissed as irrational nonsense Jewish literal treatments in the Talmud of references to God having bodily parts. He thought it was obvious that God could not be a corporeal being thinking and moving in the way humans do. Christians welcomed Peter’s work as an excellent rejoinder to a familiar Jewish claim that Christians in their talk about the Incarnation had demeaned God by giving him a body. The Jews, on Peter’s understanding, had been guilty of much more serious indiscretions in speaking of God. At this stage allusion to the Talmud had proved useful to bolster Christian arguments in favour of the Incarnation."
Great article about the "carnalization" which is probably the most important thing that happened to the two immature types of modern Monotheism, noting that Monotheism is the original religion of Adam/Eve as per Quran.
I don't know why it is such a misunderstood piece of info but it is. The Quran states it openly...could it be that the Quran was just guessing at this fundamental problem that was to erupt in the 13th century (solar reckoning)?
Here it is according to Pickthal:
PICKTHAL: And the Jews say the Christians follow nothing (true), and the Christians say the Jews follow nothing (true); yet both are readers of the Scripture. Even thus speak those who know not. Allah will judge between them on the Day of Resurrection concerning that wherein they differ.
It is pretty simple and clear to me...how is it that they don't get it?
hey, nice to meet you.
arif
That is one helluvan article. It spells out everything except, of course, the influence of Islam on the both of them.
Those two (Xtianity and Judasim) in a constant bickering match over the crime scene and fallout.
But nary a mention of the single most important clue.
Post a Comment